Tell me how you move, I’ll tell you how you’ll live
1.) Why mobility?
The transport sector accounts for slightly more than 20% of global CO2-emissions (1). For Germany, this means that transport, aviation and shipping have caused 173 million tons CO2 in 2023 (2), also about a fifth of overall emissions. This sector is extremely important for current climate policies, if we want to limit the extent to which we exceed the safe boundaries of global warming. Changes in mobility have immediate and potentially drastic effects on greenhouse gas emissions because the modes of transport and kinds of engines hugely impact the amount of emissions per person/km:
The amount of CO2 per flying passenger is five to ten times higher than by train, depending on occupancy and is even higher if electricity used comes from 100% renewable sources (3). In addition to this, airplanes cause other climate harming emissions and they release them in the upper troposphere (8-10km) where they cause much more intense greenhouse effects. Because of their stricter occupancy policy, long distance bus coaches can even be more efficient than train travel (4). For medium and long distance travel, busses and trains also have less environmental costs than electric cars (4). And let’s not even get started on cruise ships! (5)
In many sectors (electricity, heating, industry) there have been continuous (though still insufficient) successes in emissions reduction, but notably the sector of transport and aviation is largely stagnating. For this reason, public demands and pressure against the influence of fossil lobbyists and outdated industry positions is particularly important.
The question of mobility combines everyday behaviour, public infrastructure and political decision making and shows how the fight against the climate crisis and for a fundamental system change needs the interplay between changing attitudes, changing policies and changing technologies. These changes are actively obstructed by business tycoons and by government policies in many countries. Fossil subsidies are a waste of taxpayer money, that should be used for the common good instead. The German government spends more than 45 billion € every year on diverse kinds of direct and indirect fossil subsidies (for fossil energy, no VAT on international flights, tax privileges for company cars) (6). Comparing these amounts to the annual costs of 1,5 billion € for the Deutschlandticket – 2,5 billion € for the 9€-ticket in 2022 –, which is regularly put into question by right wing press and politicians – the disproportion is obvious and outrageous!
2.) What are the reasonable demands?
· affordable public transport
· affordable rail tickets
· better rail infrastructure
· shift freight transport from air & road to trains
· more night trains to replace plane travel
· ban private jets
· abolish short haul flights
· tax frequent flyers and include the true environmental costs in the price of plane tickets
· cut subsidies and tax breaks for fossil fuels (kerosene tax, Dienstwagenprivileg, etc.)
· speed limits (20 km/h in residential areas, 30 km/h inner city, 80 km/h over land, 100 km/h on the Autobahn)
· ban new internal combustion engines
· higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs
· intelligent public transport / carpooling in rural areas
· more car-free zones in cities
· more and safer bike lanes
· design 15 minute cities to encourage walking
3.) What are the general benefits beyond emissions?
Affordable, safe and attractive public transport systems foster social cohesion and a sense of common ownership of public infrastructure. They also enable social participation for disenfranchised people because they provide access to places of work, education, culture and leisure that are otherwise closed to them. We need to move away from actual and perceived dependencies on individual car use, which put enormous stress on people, the environment and on our use of public spaces. An ecologically viable, de-fossilised mobility infrastructure also is much more economically sustainable and makes our society more resilient and independent. (7)
There are obvious and immediate benefits for the health of the mobile individual. Walking and cycling prevent cardiovascular diseases, moving outside is good for mental health and stress reduction. Cars do not only cause greenhouse gas emissions but also other pollutants. Reducing car traffic and speed in urban spaces improves air quality and thus public health. (8)
Sources:
(1) https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset_ghg2025#p1m
(2) https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/ghg-emissions-by-sector?tab=discrete-bar&time=latest&country=~DEU
(3) https://www.co2online.de/klima-schuetzen/bahn-oder-flugzeug-der-vergleich/
(4) https://www.vcd.org/artikel/verkehrsmittel-im-vergleich/
(5) https://www.goclimate.de/artikel/co2-kreuzfahrt/#was-verbraucht-mehr-co2-flugzeug-oder-schiff
(6) https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/umweltschaedliche-subventionen-in-deutschland-0
(7) https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/umweltvertraglicher-verkehr-2050-argumente-fur-eine
(8) https://breathecities.org/breathe-better-how-leading-cities-have-rapidly-cut-air-pollution/